LIBERAL: Anyone who is too scared to refute an inflammatory writer should get the hell out of the way and let more courageous people do it.
SJW: STOP TRIGGERING ME! The free marketplace of ideas isn’t infallible. What if they actually win?!
LIBERAL: Nobody ever said it was.
But anyways: see all these here ‘arguments’ of fascists, are pretty damn easy to refute. They’re founded almost entirely upon raw, unprocessed animal sentiment alone (hint-hint).
SJW: BUT WHAT IF WE DON’T WIN?! WHERE’S MY SAFE SPACE!
LIBERAL: There is no such word as ‘we.’ You should not project your cowardice and poor debating skills and lack of intelligence onto anyone else.
SJW: BUT HOW DO YOU KNOW WE’RE GOING TO WIN? BOO… BOO… BOO-HOO-HOO….
LIBERAL: Well, it’s interesting that it’s precisely those advocating censorship who are least capable of basic rational discussion, and who are least competent to defeat fanatics or extremists in the field of battle.
Maybe that’s why they want to censor their enemies.
“If I can’t refute these people, then nobody can!”
Classic case of Aesop’s dog in the manger…
SJW: CHECK YOUR GODDAMN PRIVILEGE, you ignorant right-wing bigot!
LIBERAL: Right-wing? The name’s ‘liberal.’ The clue’s in the name, asshole!
SJW: STOP TRIGGERING ME! SOMEBODY ARREST THIS IGNORANT RIGHT WING BIGOT NOW! SAFE SPACE! SAFE SPACE! SAFE SPACE! WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
LIBERAL #2: Too much espresso?
LIBERAL #2: Thought not.
LIBERAL #2: Probably.
[Hideous scream heard in the distance: STOP MAKING FUN OF THE JIM JONES SUICIDE VICTIM COMMUNITY! THEY ARE DIVERSITY TOO, AND THEY HAVE FEELINGS!!!!!!!!!!!!]
LIBERAL: … Seriously, what is it with these fuckin’ SJW types and their privileged bouzhee Jonesophobia? Ideological diversity is our greatest strength! You have to take the Jones folks as they are, not as who you want them to be!
LIBERAL #2: … You freakin’ SHITTIN’ ME, MAN?!
LIBERAL: Yeah. Like, no frickin’ shit, bro! Let’s go ’n’ have a fuckin’ Bud.
#LIBERAL #2: Fuckin’ DOWN wi’ that shit, dawg!