Comments on: Conservative Eroticism versus Liberal Eroticism

By: Charles Wang

Charles Wang — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:31:44 +0000

Eroticism cannot be taken seriuosly…

By: Charles L. Wang

Charles L. Wang — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:35:30 +0000

Damn it Rusty, didn’t you read the Title: EROTICISM!@

By: Charles L. Wang

Charles L. Wang — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:15:39 +0000

Also, I would pose this question: if “love is so free”, then wouldn’t most black people in America marry white people in America? Wouldn’t most Catholic marry protestant?

I’m too high to list more, but think about this fact…

but think about this and happy love making!

By: Charles L. Wang

Charles L. Wang — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:08:35 +0000

I would take the the time to answer all of your comments. However, perhaps maybe you you check out all the sources I’ve used to write this article (e.g. “How Liberals and Conservatives think” and etc…)

I don’t have the time to list them all …

But regardless how you all think, happy Love Making

and Happy Chinese New Year!!!

By: P. Beckert

P. Beckert — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:51:30 +0000

Well then, it was obviously mis-categorized. Perhaps it should have been posted under “News in your Briefs.” I certainly agree with you rfreed. This particular piece should not be taken seriously at all.

Wang，我不可能不会由您的文章触犯的认为一名美国妇女。它是非常侮辱的往所有妇女。

By: rfreed

rfreed — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:48:06 +0000

Folks, lets take a another, more careful look at this. I believe the entire bit was intended humorously and that something was lost in translation. I am willing to bet that Mr. Wang, whose first language I’m assuming is Chinese, was trying to get things (concepts) over in English that were difficult and the meanings got scewered. Written a bit clearer it possibly could be quite clever.

By: BobZaguy

BobZaguy — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:03:07 +0000

Why is conservative eroticism so much nicer than liberal eroticism to you?

Doesn’t make sense.

Pat Nixon became an alcoholic, just like Mamie Eisenhower. So did Betty Ford –with her own clinic no less. Nany Reagan sought out psychics. Laura Bush seemed to be on Demarol. There’s no explaining Barbara Bush, except that maybe it was a sex change.

I think you are a John Birch plant.

By: Rusty

Rusty — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:15:25 +0000

Yep Charles, regardless of all the wasted bloated semantics to get to a point that is as obscure as Darth Vader’s colostomy bag records – your opinion of ‘love-making’ is akin to sex viz politics: Con’ / Lib’ – some fucker is getting screwed – normally the ‘person’ whose under the hoof.
Cigarettes, post-coitus, cause coughs.
In true love the participants screw the living hell outa each other and enjoy it – unlike the party ‘politic’ where one participant feels like they have been ‘screwed’ at the end of the day – and they don’t quite know by whom – or in which orifice.

By: Susan K. Beal

Susan K. Beal — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:18:08 +0000

This is the most disgusting, degrading and demeaning dribble I think I’ve ever read. Either you’re seriously sexually deprived, or you are a sexual predator lying in wait.

Howard Stern is a choir boy compared to this garbage. This crap doesn’t deserve to be in the company of some of the really great and funny stuff I’ve read here! What a slap in the face to the good stuff that is posted here.

Have you no respect or decency? Apparently not!

By: P. Beckert

P. Beckert — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:42:07 +0000

seek help.